Peer Review

Labyrinth utilizes the double-blind peer review policy. In the first screening, especially if the author is unknown or does not submit an invited paper, the editors will carefully consider the manuscript in view of the journal's topics, style, and guidelines. If the manuscript fits the CFP, topics, style, and guidelines — and, in some cases, the special requirements of the issue — it will be blind reviewed by two qualified scholars, and the author will receive feedback within two months. The feedback will inform the author of the outcome of the peer review, which may be one of the following: 1) Accepted as is, 2) Revisions required, or 3) Rejected. Only papers requiring revisions receive detailed feedback with instructions.

Note: The journal only accepts manuscripts that are unpublished and not currently under review for any other printed or electronic publication. Manuscripts that are available on the internet as working papers are not eligible for submission; they must be removed from the website beforehand, as only the published final version may be shared.

By submitting a paper, authors implicitly agree to Labyrinth's terms of peer review, publication ethics, and copyright transfer.