On Gadamer's Heteronomy Argument: The "Irruption" of Reality vs. its "Strategic Excision"
Keywords:Hans-Georg Gadamer, Carl Schmitt, Stephen Greenblatt, Hamlet, heteronomy, aesthetic consciousness, endless dialogue, finitism
The aim of this paper is to find out whether Gadamer is entitled to hold together his finitist commitment to the heteronomy of art and thought, and his advocacy of an "endless conversation with itself" of humankind. We focus on three texts: Gadamer’s dismissal of Carl Schmitt’s outside-in account of the heteronomy implied by the "irruption of reality" in the play Hamlet and, as Archimedean point, Shakespeare’s "excision of reality" according to Stephen Greenblatt, and its inside-out heteronomic consequences. The results: Schmitt’s approach restricts Gadamer’s argument on the "endless dialogue", Gadamer’s rejoinder aggravates his own argumentative fragility, and Greenblatt’s perspectivation discloses a non-sequitur. The inspection of these texts attests that heteronomy per se does not entail any openness to "creative" interpretations, that a universalized logos endiéthetos is a chimera, and that there cannot be any "infinite conversation" which would sustain the Gadamerian interplay of question and answer.
Augustine of Hippo. 2015. The Trinity (De trinitate). Translated by Edmund Hill, 2nd ed. New York: New City Press.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1976. "Zur Problematik des Selbstverständnisses". In Kleine Schriften I. Philosophie. Hermeneutik. 2nd ed. Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1986. "On the Contribution of Poetry to the Search for Truth". In The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays, ed. by R. Bernasconi. New York: Cambridge U.P. Original edition: Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1997. "Über den Beitrag der Dichtkunst bei der Suche nach Wahrheit." In Gesammelte Werke, vol. 8. Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1993. Gadamer im Gespräch, edited by Carsten Dutt. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. 2004. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall, 2nd revised ed. New York: Crossroads Publishing. Original edition: Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. Wahrheit und Methode. 4th ed. Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck.
Galli, Carlo. 2012. "Hamlet: Representation and the Concrete." In Political Theology and Early Modernity, edited by G. Hammill and J. R. Lupton. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press: 60-83.
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1980. Renaissance Self-Fashioning. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Greenblatt, Stephen. 2001. Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton: Princeton U.P.
Greenblatt, Stephen. 2004. Will of the World: How Shakespeare became Shakespeare. New York: Norton.
Grondin, Jean. 1990. "Sulla composizione di ‘Verità e metodo'." Rivista di Estetica (39): 3-21.
Grondin, Jean. 1994. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics. Translated by J. Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale U. P.
Höfele, Andreas. 2016. No Hamlets: German Shakespeare from Nietzsche to Carl Schmitt. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
Liessmann, Konrad Paul. 2003. "Die Sollbruchstelle". In Gadamer Verstehen / Understanding Gadamer, edited by M. Wischke and M. Hofer. 211-231. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Marder, Michael. 2010. "Political Hermeneutics, or Why Schmitt Is Not the Enemy of Gadamer." In Consequences of Hermeneutics. Fifty Years After Gadamer's Truth and Method, edited by J. Malpas and S. Zabala. 306-323. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Risser, James. 2002. "In the Shadow of Hegel: Infinite Dialogue in Gadamer's Hermeneutics." Research in Phenomenology (32): 86-102.
Robson, Mark. 2008. Stephen Greenblatt. Abingdon: Routledge.
Schmitt, Carl. 2006. Hamlet or Hecuba: The Irruption of Time into the Play. Translated by Simona Draghici. Corvallis: Plutarch Press. Original edition: Schmitt, Carl. 2017. Hamlet oder Hekuba. Der Einbruch der Zeit in das Spiel. 6th ed. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Strauss, Leo and Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1978. "Correspondence Concerning Wahrheit und Methode." The Independent Journal of Philosophy (2): 5-12.
Wood, James. 2009. How Fiction Works. London: Macmillan.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Labyrinth
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
After acceptation of the paper, the author has to sign a Copyright Transfer Agreement granting to Labyrinth and Axia Academic Publishers the exclusive copyrights for the online and printed editions, and to deal with reprint requests from third parties. On special occasions, articles and studies published in Labyrinth may be republished in textbooks or collective works of Axia Academic Publishers as well as translated and published in other languages. By submitting a paper to Labyrinth, you implicitely agree with these conditions.