On hermeneutical openness and wilful hermeneutical ignorance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v24i1.284

Keywords:

Gadamer, hermeneutics, epistemic injustice, wilful ignorance, hermeneutical openess

Abstract

In this paper I argue for the relevance of the philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer for contemporary feminist scholarship on epistemic injustice and oppression. Specifically, I set out to argue for the Gadamerian notion of hermeneutical openness as an important hermeneutic virtue, and a potential remedy for existing epistemic injustices. In doing so I follow feminist philosophers such as Linda Martín Alcoff and Georgia Warnke that have adopted the insights of Gadamer for the purpose of social and feminist philosophy. Further, this paper is positioned in relation to a recent book chapter by Cynthia Nielsen and David Utsler in which they argue for the complementarity, and intersecting themes and concerns of Gadamer's hermeneutics and Miranda Fricker's work on epistemic injustice. However, Nielsen and Utsler solely focus on Fricker's conception of epistemic injustice and the two forms of epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice, that she identifies. In this paper I expand their analysis by considering other forms of epistemic injustice such as wilful hermeneutical ignorance and contributory injustice. Thus, this paper contributes to the budding literature on the relevance of Gadamer's work for the debates pertaining to epistemic injustice and oppression by expanding such analysis to other forms of epistemic injustice, and by further arguing for the strength of Gadamer's work in terms of offering relevant insights for the reduction and remedy of existing epistemic injustices.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alcoff, Linda Martín. 1996. Real Knowing: New Versions of the Coherence Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2003. "Gadamer's Feminist Epistemology". In Code, Lorrai-ne (Ed.) Feminist Interpretations of Hans-George Gadamer. University Park, Penn-sylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. 231-258.

Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2005. Visible Identities: Race, Gender, and the Self. New York: Oxford University Press.

Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2010. Epistemic Identities. Episteme. Volume 7, Issue 2. 128-137.

Barthold, Lauren Swayne. 2016. A Hermeneutical Approach to Gender and Other Social Identities. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Battaly, Heather. 2017. "Testimonial Injustice, Epistemic Vice, and Vice Episte-mology," in Kidd, Ian James, Polhaus, Gaile and Medina, José (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. New York: Routledge. 223–231.

Burke, Haley Irene. 2022. Developing Gadamerian Virtues Against Epistemic In-justice: The Epistemic and Hermeneutic Dimensions of Ethics. Journal of Applied Hermeneutics.

Carel, Havi & Kidd, Ian James. 2014. Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philoso-phial analysis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 17(4), 529-540.

Code, Lorraine. 2003. "Introduction: Why Feminists Do Not Read Gadamer". In Code, Lorraine (Ed.) Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. 1-36.

Davey, Nicholas. 2006. Unquiet Understanding. Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics. Albany: SUNY Press.

Dotson, Kristie. 2012. "A cautionary tale: On limiting epistemic oppression". Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies. 33: 24–47.

Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fricker, Miranda. 2013. Epistemic Justice as a Condition of Political Freedom? Synthese. Vol. 190, Issue 7. 1317-1332

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1976. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Translated by D. E. Linge (ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1992. 'The Diversity of Europe: Inheritance and Future', in Misgeld, Dieter & Nicholson, Graeme (Eds.), and Schmidt, Lawrence & Reuss, Moni-ca (trans.) Hans-Georg Gadamer On Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Herme-neutics. Albany: SUNY Press.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and Method. 2nd Edition. Translated by J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall. New York: Continuum.

Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? : thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Hoffman, Susan-Judith. 2003 "Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics and Femi-nist Projects". In Code, Lorraine (Ed.) Feminist Interpretations of Hans-George Gada-mer. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. 81-108.

Honneth, Axel. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Translated by J. Anderson. Cambridge: Polity.

Kidd, Ian James & Carel, Havi. 2017. Epistemic injustice and illness. Journal of applied philosophy. 34(2), 172-190.

Landström, Karl. 2021. Archives, Epistemic Injustice and Knowing the Past. Ethics and Social Welfare, 15(4), 379-394.

Medina, José. 2013. The Epistemology of Resistance. New York: Oxford University Press

Mills, Charles. 1997. The racial contract. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Nielsen, Cynthia R., and Utsler, David. 2022. 'Gadamer, Fricker, and Honneth: Testimonial Injustice, Prejudice, and Social Esteem', in Giladi, Paul and McMillan, Nicola. (eds.) Epistemic Injustice and the Philosophy of Recognition. London: Routledge.

Pohlhaus Jr., Gaile. 2012. "Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of 'Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance'". Hypatia 27 (4): 715–35.

Risser, James. 1997. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics. Albany: SUNY Press.

Vasterling, Veronica. 2003. "Postmodern Hermeneutics? Toward a Critical Hermeneutics". In Code, Lorraine (Ed.) Feminist Interpretations of Hans-George Gada-mer. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. 159-180.

Warnke, Georgia. 2015. 'Hermeneutics and Feminism', in J. Malpas and H-H. Gander (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

17.09.2022

How to Cite

Landström, K. . (2022). On hermeneutical openness and wilful hermeneutical ignorance. Labyrinth, 24(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v24i1.284