Sartre et Nizan, politique des mots

Elisa Reato

Abstract


Sartre and Nizan, politique of words

 

The aim of this article is to discuss and compare the main points of Nizans and Sartres views of committed literature. Discarding the claim to be objective and neutral, Nizan states that to abstain is to make a choice. Therefore, he critiques the intellectuals to be guilty of an abdication of responsibility. In his writings (specially Antoine Bloyé [1933], The Trojan Horse [1935], The Conspiracy [1938]) Nizan posed some questions, which became crucial for the postwar debates on the engagement of the intellectual. These questions constitute a central aspect of Sartres writings after World War II, where Sartre criticizes writers who had not taken a stance against oppression and delineates the axes of a theory of committed literature. As a result of the comparative analysis between the two authors, it is shown that Sartre articulates an important point that Nizan have missed, namely that there is a praxis, which is specific to literature and that we should part from it in order to understand commitment. Thus, at the difference of Nizan, Sartre points out that the liberating dimension of literary criticism should not be too quickly confused with armed criticism.

 


Keywords


Jean-Paul Sartre, Paul Nizan, committed literature, responsibility, oppression

References


Astruc, Alexandre / Contat, Michel. Sartre, un film. Paris: Gallimard, 1977.

Beauvoir, Simone de. Mémoires. Paris, Gallimard: 2018.

Beauvoir, Simone de. Pour une morale de l’ambiguïté (1947), Paris: Gallimard, 2013.

Cohen-Solal, Annie / Nizan, Henriette, Nizan, communiste impossible. Paris: Grasset, 1980.

Denis, Benoît. Littérature et engagement. De Pascal à Sartre. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2000.

Gerassi, John. Entretiens avec Sartre. Paris: Grasset, 2011.

Hollier, Denis. Politique de la prose. Jean-Paul Sartre et l’an quarante. Paris: Gallimard, 1982.

Louette, Jean-François. Sartre contra Nietzsche. Grenoble: PUG, 1996.

Louette, Jean-François. Sartre et Beauvoir, roman et philosophie. Genève: La Baconnière, 2019.

Nizan, Paul. Aden Arabie (1931). Paris: La Découverte, 2002.

Nizan, Paul. Antoine Bloyé (1933). Paris: Grasset, 2016.

Nizan, Paul. La Conspiration (1938). Paris: Gallimard, 2018.

Nizan Paul. Le Cheval de Troie (1935). Paris: Gallimard, 2009.

Nizan, Paul. Les Chiens de garde (1932). Marseille: Agone, 2012.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. "La Conspiration par Paul Nizan", Situations, I, Paris: Gallimard, 1947a. 25-28.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. "Une idée fondamentale de la phénoménologie de Husserl : l’intentionnalité", Situations, I. Paris: Gallimard, 1947b. 29-32.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. La Responsabilité de l’écrivain. Paris: Verdier, 2000.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. "Écrire pour son époque", Les Écrits de Sartre (1980), éd. Contat, Michel et Michel Rybalka, Paris: Gallimard, 2013a. 670-676.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. "Les Écrivains en personne", Situations, IX (1972). Paris: Gallimard, 2013b. 9-39.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Les Mots (1964). Paris: Gallimard, 2010.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Réflexions sur la question juive (1946), Paris: Gallimard, 2009.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Saint Genet, comédien et martyr (1952), Paris: Gallimard, 2011.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. Situations, II. Paris: Gallimard, 1948.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. "Paul Nizan", Situations, IV (1964), Paris: Gallimard, 1980a.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. "Plaidoyer pour les intellectuels. Préface", Situations, VIII (1972), Paris: Gal-limard, 1980b. 373-476.

Tamassia, Paolo. Politiche della scrittura. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 2001.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25180/lj.v22i1.221

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Labyrinth

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

PRINTED ISSN: 2410-4817

ONLINE ISSN: 1561-8927

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25180/lj

Creative Commons License

The online edition of Labyrinth is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Published with the suppport of the Cultural Department of the City of Vienna 

Referat Wissenschafts- und Forschungsförderung der Kulturabteilung (MA 7) der Stadt Wien