Institutionalization and autonomy of art: Can socially engaged art be institutionalized?

Bruno Trentini

Abstract


This paper deals with the autonomy of art and more specifically with the autonomy of socially engaged art once it is institutionalized. The originality of the article is its use of Goodman's terminology to theorize socially engaged art. By comparing two works of art from the same collective (one without an institutional framework and the other in a festival), the main issue is to defend the hypothesis that artistic consecration prevents an emancipatory action from functioning as art or prevents an action from functioning as socially engaged art. Thus, in the context of engaged art, the question is no longer "when is art?" but "where is art?".

 


Keywords


autonomy of art, socially engaged art, emancipation, aesthetic attitude, institutionalization of art

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adorno, Theodor W. Aesthetic Theory. London: The Athlone Press, 1997.

Belting, Hans. The End of the History of Art? Chicago&London: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

Bishop, Claire. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. Lon-don & New York: Verso, 2012.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge-Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1984.

Bullough, Edward. "‘Psychical Distance' as a Factor in Art and an Aesthetic Principle", British Journal of Psychology 5, 1912. 87-118.

Debord, Guy. The Society of the Spectacle. Detroit: Black & Red, 1970.

Dickie, George. "Defining Art." American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 3, 1969. 253–256.

Dickie, George. "The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude." American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 1, no. 1, 1964. 56-65.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Compa-ny, 1989.

Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1976.

Goodman, Nelson. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1978.

Greenberg, Clement. "Modernist Painting", Voice of America, 1960, repr. in F. Frascina & C. Harris (dir.), Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology. London: Paul Chapman, 1988. 5-10.

Horkheimer, Max & Adorno, Theodor W. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments. Stanford University Press, 2002.

Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. Indi-anapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008.

Jauss, Hans Robert. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception, in Theory and History of Literature vol2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Oxford University Press, 2007.

Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of the Practical reason. Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett, 2002.

Kant, Immanuel. "An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?", in M. J. Gregor (dir.), Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Pavlenski, Piotr quoted in Luhn, Alec. "Russian artist cuts off earlobe in protest at use of forced psychiatry on dissidents". The Guardian, 20th October 2014.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/20/russian-artist-cuts-off-earlobe-protest-forced-psychiatric-treatment-dissidents

Puglisi, Catherine. Caravage. Paris: Phaidon. 2005.

Rancière, Jacques. The Emancipated Spectator. London: Verso, 2009.

Sardinha, Diogo. "L'émancipation, de Kant à Deleuze : devenir majeur, devenir mineur", Les Temps Modernes, vol. 665, no 4, 2011. 145-164.

Stolnitz, Jerome. "‘The Aesthetic Attitude' in the Rise of Modern Aesthetics." The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 36, no. 4, 1978. 409-422.

Stolnitz, Jerome. Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art Criticism. Cambridge: Riverside Press, 1960.

Wellmer, Albrecht. "Über Negativität und Autonomie der Kunst. Die Aktualität Adornos Ästhetik und blinde Flecken seiner Musikphilosophie", in A. Honneth (ed.), Dialektik der Freiheit. Frankfurter Adorno-Konferenz 2003, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2005. 237-278.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25180/lj.v22i2.235

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Labyrinth

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

PRINTED ISSN: 2410-4817

ONLINE ISSN: 1561-8927

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25180/lj

Creative Commons License

The online edition of Labyrinth is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Published with the suppport of the Cultural Department of the City of Vienna 

Referat Wissenschafts- und Forschungsförderung der Kulturabteilung (MA 7) der Stadt Wien