Camus and Aristotle on the Art Community and its Errors

Authors

  • Gene Fendt University of Nebraska, Kearney

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v22i2.238

Keywords:

barbarian, civilized, modern, Albert Camus, Aristotle, art, community

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show the agreement of Camus and Aristotle on the cultural function of the art community (the community of artist and audience), in particular their criticism of what should be called barbarian or nihilistic practices of art.  Camus' art and criticism have been frequent targets of modern critics, but his point is and would be that such critics have the wrong idea of the purpose of art.  His answer to such critics and the parallelism of his ideas with Aristotle's criticism of barbarian culture, show that the real issue between Camus and his critics is cultural.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus and other Essays. Translated by Justin O'Brien. New York: Random House, 1955.

Camus, Albert. Lyrical and Critical Essays. Translated by Ellen Conroy Kennedy. New York: Vintage, 1970.

Camus, Albert. The Fall. Translated by Justin O'Brien. New York: Vintage, 1991.

Camus, Albert. Resistance, Rebellion and Death. Translated by Justin O'Brien. New York: Vin-tage, 1995.

Carroll, David. "The Colonial City and the Question of Borders: Albert Camus's Allegory of Oran." L'Esprit Créateur, Vol. 41, Nr. 3, (Fall 2001): 88-104.

Coatzee, J.M. Waiting for the Barbarians. New York: Penguin, 1980.

Dahlberg, Edward. "Can These Bones Live?" in The Edward Dahlberg Reader. New York: New Directions, 1957.

Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and its Discontents. Translated by James Strachey. New York: W.W. Norton, 2010.

Garfitt, Toby. "Situating Camus: The formative influences," in Edward J. Hughes (ed.). Cam-bridge Companion to Camus. Cambridge: University Press, 2007. 26-38.

Herbert, Zbigniew. Barbarian in the Garden. Translated by Michael March and Jaroslaw Anders. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich, 1986.

Hughes, Edward J. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Camus. Cambridge: University Press, 2007.

Kelly, Debra. "Le Premier Homme and the literature of loss," in Edward J. Hughes (ed.). Cam-bridge Companion to Camus. Cambridge: University Press, 2007. 191-202.

Keynes, John Maynard. "Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren," in Essays in Persuasion. London: Macmillan and Co., 1931.

Lorcin, Patricia M.E. "Politics, Artistic Merit, and the Posthumous Reputation of Albert Camus." South Central Review 31.3 (Fall 2014): 9-26.

Margerrison, Christine. "Ces Forces Obscures De L'Âme": Women, Race and Origins in the Writ-ings of Albert Camus. Leiden: Brill-Rodopi, 2008.

Nancy, Jean-Luc. Adoration: The Deconstruction of Christianity II. Translated by John McKeane. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.

Newmark, Kevin. "Tongue-tied: What Camus's Fiction Couldn't Teach Us about Ethics and Politics," in Margerrison, Christine, Mark Orme, and Lissa Lincoln (eds). Albert Camus in the 21st Century: A Reassessment of His Thinking at the Dawn of the New Millennium. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2008. 107-120.

O'Brien, Conor Cruise. Albert Camus: Of Europe and Africa. New York: Viking Press, 1970. Said, Edward. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Alfred A, Knopf, 1993.

Sartre, Jean Paul. Jean Paul Existentialism and Human Emotions. Translated by Bernard Frecht-man. New York: Citadel Press, 1985.

Sharpe, Matthew. Camus, Philosophe, To return to our beginnings. Leiden: Brill. 2015.

van der Poel, Ieme. "Camus: A life lived in critical times" in Edward J. Hughes (ed.). Cambridge Companion to Camus. Cambridge: University Press, 2007. 13-25.

Wallace, David Foster. Consider the Lobster. London: Little, Brown Book Company, 2005.

Downloads

Published

30.12.2020

How to Cite

Fendt, G. (2020). Camus and Aristotle on the Art Community and its Errors. Labyrinth, 22(2), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v22i2.238

Issue

Section

Aesthetics, Art(theory), and Society