La perte du monde comme catastrophe normative : une théorie des médiations à partir de Hannah Arendt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v28i1.404Keywords:
Hannah Arendt, loss of the world, normative catastrophe, mediations, normative center, judgment, responsibility, shevirat ha-kelimAbstract
This article proposes a reinterpretation of Arendt’s notion of the loss of the world based on a theory of the mediations that constitute the common world. It introduces the concept of “normative catastrophe” to describe situations in which fragmentation affects not only norms or institutions, but also the mediations that make possible the coordination of judgment, the recognition of responsibilities, and the collective organization of meaning. The notion of “normative center” allows us to formalize this dynamic configuration. From a hermeneutic and structural perspective, the Lurianic schema of shevirat ha-kelim is then invoked as a heuristic model of disarticulation, dispersion, and rearticulation, without positing any connection between Arendt and Lurianic Kabbalah. This conceptualization ultimately enables us to examine the contemporary fragmentation of validation regimes and mechanisms of accountability, as well as the conditions for reestablishing a common world.
Downloads
References
Arendt, Hannah. 1972. La Crise de la culture. Huit exercices de pensée politique. Traduit sous la direction de Patrick Lévy. Paris: Gallimard.Arendt, Hannah. 1991a. Eichmann à Jérusalem. Rapport sur la banalité du mal. Paris : Gallimard.
Arendt, Hannah. 1991b. Juger. Sur la philosophie politique de Kant. Suivi de deux essais interprétatifs par Ronald Beiner et Myriam Revault d’Allonnes. Paris : Seuil.
Arendt, Hannah. 2002. Les Origines du totalitarisme. Paris : Gallimard.
Arendt, Hannah. 2005. Responsabilité et jugement. Traduit par Jean-Luc Fidel. Paris : Payot.
Arendt, Hannah. 2013. La Vie de l’esprit. Traduit par Lucienne Lotringer. 2e éd. Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
Arendt, Hannah. 2018. Condition de l’homme moderne. Traduit par Georges Fradier. Paris : Calmann-Lévy.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
Beiner, Ronald. 1983. Political Judgment. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York : Anchor Books.
Bernstein, Richard J. 1996. Hannah Arendt and the Jewish Question. Cambridge : Polity Press.
Birmingham, Peg. 2006. Hannah Arendt and Human Rights: The Predicament of Common Responsibility. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
Canovan, Margaret. 1992. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1975. L’Institution imaginaire de la société. Paris : Seuil.
Durkheim, Émile. 2007. De la division du travail social. 7e éd. Introduction de Serge Paugam. Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
Ferrara, Alessandro. 2008. The Force of the Example: Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment. New York : Columbia University Press.
Fine, Lawrence. 2003. Physician of the Soul, Healer of the Cosmos: Isaac Luria and His Kabbalistic Fellowship. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
Floridi, Luciano. 2014. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1969. L’Archéologie du savoir. Paris : Gallimard.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1996. Vérité et méthode. Les grandes lignes d’une herméneutique philosophique. Paris : Seuil.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. Théorie de l’agir communicationnel. 2 vol. Paris : Fayard.
Han, Byung-Chul. 2022. Infocratie. Numérique et crise de la démocratie. Traduit par Olivier Mannoni. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Idel, Moshe. 1988. Kabbalah: New Perspectives. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1995. Critique de la faculté de juger. Traduit par Alain Renaut. Paris : Aubier.
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1990. Le Futur passé. Contribution à la sémantique des temps historiques. Paris : Éditions de l’EHESS.
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2006. “Crisis.” Translated by Michaela W. Richter. Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (2): 357–400.
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1979. La Condition postmoderne. Rapport sur le savoir. Paris : Les Éditions de Minuit.
Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
Passerin d’Entrèves, Maurizio. 1994. The Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt. London : Routledge.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
Ricœur, Paul. 1983–1985. Temps et récit. 3 vol. Paris : Seuil.
Ricœur, Paul. 1986. Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II. Paris : Seuil.
Ricœur, Paul. 1990. Soi-même comme un autre. Paris : Seuil.
Scholem, Gershom. 1965. On the Kabbalah and Its Symbolism. New York : Schocken Books.
Scholem, Gershom. 1968. Les Grands Courants de la mystique juive. Paris : Payot.
Sunstein, Cass R. 2017. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
Tassin, Étienne. 1999. Le Trésor perdu. Hannah Arendt, l’intelligence de l’action politique. Paris : Payot.
Taylor, Charles. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC : Duke University Press.
Vital, Ḥayyim. 1960. ʿEṣ Ḥayyim. Jérusalem : Yeshivat ha-Mekubalim Shaʿar ha-Shamayim.
Wolfson, Elliot R. 2005. Language, Eros, Being: Kabbalistic Hermeneutics and Poetic Imagination. New York : Fordham University Press.
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Labyrinth

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
After acceptation of the paper, the author has to sign a Copyright Transfer Agreement granting to Labyrinth and Axia Academic Publishers the exclusive copyrights for the online and printed editions, and to deal with reprint requests from third parties. On special occasions, articles and studies published in Labyrinth may be republished in textbooks or collective works of Axia Academic Publishers as well as translated and published in other languages. By submitting a paper to Labyrinth, you implicitely agree with these conditions.
















